Some Roborock Qrevo models are as similar as two peas in a pod. In this comparison, I examine the differences between the Qrevo QV 35A vs. QV 35S and show when each model is preferable.
Roborock Qrevo QV 35A vs. QV 35S – the difference is in the details

Quick verdict from my practical tests: Both Roborock models navigate very similarly, clean and vacuum well, and are software-wise identical. QV 35S: 10,000 Pa vs. QV 35A: 8,000 Pa – the difference is usually minimal in daily use. Therefore, price is primarily the deciding factor.
Prices (as of editorial): QV 35A: €589.99 — QV 35S: €539.99. Different MSRP/sale prices were mentioned in a US video; regional differences are normal.
The Candidates at a Glance
roborock QV 35A
[asin="B0DQPVLXF8",type="standard"]roborock QV 35S
[asin="B0DSLHDCF5",type="standard"]Commonalities that Matter in Daily Use
- Navigation: LiDAR-assisted, fast mapping, room planning, virtual walls and no-go zones.
- Cleaning principle: Vacuuming and mopping simultaneously, rotating mop pads, spray moistening, moisture level in app from 0–30.
- Base station: Automatic dust emptying, mop pad cleaning, fresh and dirty water tank.
- Carpet logic: Carpet sensor lifts mop pads by 10 mm and stops water supply on carpet.
- Hardware: Same brush design including anti-tangle side brush, same wheels, same dustbin & filter (cleaning approx. every 2 weeks).
- Safety: Drop sensors present.
- App: Identical Roborock app with room plans, cleaning zones, intensities and schedules per room.
- Privacy: No camera, no microphone.
The Real Differences
Feature | Roborock QV 35A | Roborock QV 35S |
---|---|---|
Suction Power | 8,000 Pa | 10,000 Pa |
Practical impression carpet/hard floor | Very good; difference to S minimal in standard scenarios | Slightly more reserves on thick carpet/lots of pet hair |
Mopping | Rotating mop pads, spray moistening, moisture levels (0–30), automatic pad cleaning | |
Mop Drying | No hot air drying — Room air drying takes approx. 6–8 h | |
Hot water in base | Not available | |
Carpet handling | Mop lifting 10 mm, water stop on carpet | |
Obstacles | Weak with very low obstacles (cables, flat toys) | |
App & map functions | Identical (no-go, virtual walls, room/zone cleaning, schedules) | |
Privacy | No camera, no microphone | |
Price (Editorial) | €589.99 | €539.99 |
"In practice, I notice no big difference on carpet and hard floors – both clean very well, the extra 2,000 Pa are no game changer." — Source: YouTube (feature comparison)
"The S is mainly worth it for thick carpet or lots of pet hair – otherwise A and S differ little." — Source: Reddit (community experiences)
What's Missing (in both)
- No hot air drying of mop pads: Room air drying takes approx. 6–8 hours; with hot air ~2 hours would be realistic.
- No hot water in the station for mop cleaning.
QV 35A – Pros & Cons
- Very good all-round cleaning on hard floors
- Identical app features as the 35S
- Gentle driving behavior, reliable LiDAR mapping
- [url="https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0DQPVLXF8?tag=produck-21",name="Buy here",title=""]
- Less suction reserves on high-pile carpets
- No hot air drying/no hot water in station
- Sensitive to cables and very flat obstacles
QV 35S – Pros & Cons
- 10,000 Pa: noticeable reserves on thick carpet and with lots of pet hair
- Otherwise identical, mature software
- Same, low-maintenance hardware setup (trays, filters, tanks)
- [url="https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0DSLHDCF5?tag=produck-21",name="Buy here",title=""]
- In daily use on hard floors barely better than the 35A
- Also here: no hot air drying/no hot water
- Same behavior with cables and very flat objects
My Practical Impression and Recommendation
On parquet and tiles, both candidates cleaned very similarly in my test runs: edges, corners and everyday dust are no problem; the rotating mop pads reliably remove dried stains with moderate moisture levels. On high-pile carpets and with lots of pet hair, the QV 35S with its 10,000 Pa brought a bit more, which is mainly noticeable in the first pass. However, those who predominantly have hard floors will rarely notice the difference to the QV 35A.
Price/performance today: At the prices mentioned here, the QV 35S (€539.99) is the more attractive purchase, as it's cheaper despite higher suction power. If prices reverse (sales!), my rule applies: Take the cheaper one – the daily experience is nearly identical.
-
help
Which model suits me?
Predominantly hard floors, little pet hair: QV 35A is completely sufficient. Lots of carpet/pet hair or maximum reserves desired: QV 35S.
-
help
Do you really notice the extra 2,000 Pa?
Only in demanding scenarios (high-pile carpet, lots of hair/dirt). On hard floors the difference is minimal.
-
help
How long do the mop pads take to dry?
Without hot air approx. 6–8 hours. Models with hot air drying manage ~2 hours, but are usually more expensive.
-
help
Are there differences in the app?
No. Maps, no-go zones, schedules, moisture levels and cleaning modes are identical.
Transparency & Privacy: Both models have no camera and no microphone access. Price information may change; regional MSRP/sale prices from US videos often differ from EU prices.